Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z4's 79.8 global score. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features. Even being the best we are comparing, it must be told that it is also thicker and a little bit heavier.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit faster processor than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have a same size display, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Motorola Moto Z4 shoots much better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ features a little longer battery performance than Moto Z4, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.