Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-06-06 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gray and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z4, getting an 84.7 score against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy A32 body is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Motorola Moto Z4. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, while Motorola Moto Z4 has Android 10 operating system.
The Moto Z4 and the Galaxy A32 both count with incredibly similar processing units, both have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM. Moto Z4 has a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a better pixels density.
Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a slightly bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A32 counts with a really longer battery performance than Moto Z4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto Z4 features a bit better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a 48 mega-pixels back camera, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.