Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gray and White | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 is a little bit better than the Moto Z4, with a overall score of 82.3 against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy A60 design is just a little heavier and just a bit thicker than the Moto Z4. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A60 has 11 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10, so it provides you some extra features.
The Galaxy A60 features just a bit better looking display than Moto Z4, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A60 also counts with a little greater screen pixels density. Motorola Moto Z4 has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A60, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Moto Z4 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A60, because it has a 6% more battery capacity. The Moto Z4 counts with a better camera than Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a F1.7 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto Z4 also has a much better resolution back-facing camera and a much larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.