Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gray and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is much better than the Moto Z4's 79.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's design is newer than Moto Z4's, but it's heavier and a little thicker. These phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10, so it provides you a lot of extra features and enhanced performance.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G shoots a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a larger back camera sensor.
The Galaxy A71 5G features greater battery life than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3600mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.