Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gray and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is a bit better than the Moto Z4's general score of 79.8. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Galaxy A80 is a heavier and way thicker phone than the Moto Z4. The Galaxy A80 and Moto Z4 both feature quite similar screens, because although the Galaxy A80 has a quite inferior pixel count per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Motorola Moto Z4 has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A80 has just a little better processing power than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A80 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A80 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z4, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 3600mAh. Moto Z4 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A80, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same resolution back facing camera, the Moto Z4 also has a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.