Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-06-06 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is better than Moto Z4, having a global score of 90.5 against 79.8. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, the Galaxy A90 5G body is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Moto Z4. The Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, and Moto Z4 counts with Android 10 OS.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a bit superior processor than Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A90 5G features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A90 5G captures clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z4, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, they both have a same size camera sensor, the same video frame rate, the same resolution camera and the same (4K) video definition. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's storage to store more games and applications is just as good as the Moto Z4 one, both of them have a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and exactly the same internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with longer battery life than Moto Z4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.