Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-06-06 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is slightly better than the Moto Z4's score of 79.8. Although Galaxy C9 Pro is incredibly older and heavier than Moto Z4, it's construction is still a bit thinner. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and Moto Z4 has Android 10, so it provides some extra features and some performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro and Motorola Moto Z4 both have extremely similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit larger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a just a little better screen pixels density.
The Motorola Moto Z4 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution, a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video. The Motorola Moto Z4 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a bit superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.