Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Gray and White | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s has a score of 88, which is better than Moto Z4's 79.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy M31s's design is newer, but way thicker and somewhat heavier than Moto Z4. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M31s has the newer 11 version and Moto Z4 has Android 10.
Galaxy M31s counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a bit greater screen density, a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy M31s features just a bit better camera than Moto Z4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Moto Z4 and the Samsung Galaxy M31s have similar memory capacity to store more apps and games, they have equal internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M31s counts with a very superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.