Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-06 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z4 has a global score of 79.8, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Moto Z4 has the previous 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Even though the Moto Z4 is a lot older and way thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still noticeably lighter.
Moto Z4 features a much faster processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better screen than Moto Z4, because it has a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a larger screen and a little more pixels per screen inch.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Moto Z4, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot better video resolution, a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a more MP camera in the back. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto Z4, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Moto Z4 is also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.