Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPS | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace is just a bit better than HTC One M9, having a general score of 81.6 against 77.7. The Motorola One 5G Ace design is incredibly newer than HTC One M9's, but it is noticeably heavier and a little thicker. HTC One M9 has a better looking display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater amount of pixels per inch of screen.
The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage. HTC One M9 has a little better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64 bits CPU.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a bit better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a much bigger aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations and a way more mega-pixels camera.
Motorola One 5G Ace features a much longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC One M9. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, else you can save a couple dollars and get the HTC One M9, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.