Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| LTPS | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a bit better than Motorola One 5G Ace, having an 85.3 score against 81.6. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 body is much heavier but way thinner than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and both were released only a few months apart. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a bit more vivid display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a bigger display, a higher 1892 x 2688 resolution and a bit better amount of pixels in each display inch.
Motorola One 5G Ace has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has just a little better processing power than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Motorola One 5G Ace features a slightly better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F1.7 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Motorola One 5G Ace counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 12 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it costs more than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Microsoft Surface Duo 2, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola One 5G Ace, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.