Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 395.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is much better than the Motorola One 5G Ace's global score of 81.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 is older than Motorola One 5G Ace, it's construction is extremely lighter and much thinner. The Galaxy S20 has a brighter screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3200px resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a little bit better performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Motorola One 5G Ace takes just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a back camera with a much higher resolution, better 30 fps video frame rates and a bigger aperture to capture better images in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola One 5G Ace has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One 5G Ace. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola One 5G Ace, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.