Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 2's score of 81.6. The Motorola One 5G is a notably newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 2, although it's thicker and incredibly heavier. Google Pixel 2's CPU is very similar to the CPU in Motorola One 5G, they have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 features a little sharper display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater display density. Motorola One 5G counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola One 5G features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85 percent more battery size. The Motorola One 5G takes better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One 5G also has a bigger camera aperture, a back camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution and a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 2. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 2, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.