Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2020-09-18 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Oxford blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 398.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is a little bit better than the Motorola One 5G, with a score of 89 against 84.6. The Galaxy Note10 is an older phone than the Motorola One 5G, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. Galaxy Note10 has a screen that's just as good as the display in Motorola One 5G, although the Galaxy Note10 has a little less pixels per inch of display, a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px.
Motorola One 5G has a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better processing unit than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One 5G counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola One 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One 5G. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One 5G, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.