Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a score of 80.7, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Macro's 73.8 score. Even though the Google Pixel 3 XL is older than the Motorola One Macro, it's construction is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a much better looking display than Motorola One Macro, because it has a lot higher pixels count per inch in the screen, a quite bigger display and a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Motorola One Macro counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Macro also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Macro. They have a 4 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores.
Motorola One Macro features a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 17% greater battery size. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.