Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-12 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Macro's global score of 73.8. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has the previous 11 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version. Google Pixel 3a XL's construction is lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola One Macro, even when both of them were released with only 5 months difference.
Motorola One Macro features a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL. Both have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a sharper display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a greater pixels amount in each inch in the display.
Motorola One Macro has a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Macro also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 3a XL shoots a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a camera with a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher video resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
Motorola One Macro has just a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.