Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 271 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a little bit better than Motorola One Macro, with a 77.7 score against 73.8. HTC One M9's design is lighter than Motorola One Macro, but it is a little bit thicker and was released many years before. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but HTC One M9 has 5.0 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The HTC One M9 has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher count of pixels per screen inch and a better 1920 x 1080 resolution. The Motorola One Macro has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
HTC One M9 has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bit processor. Motorola One Macro counts with a superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2840mAh.
HTC One M9 has a better camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality, a lot higher (4K) video quality and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.