Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has an overall score of 77, which is slightly better than Motorola One Macro's score of 73.8. Although the HTC U Ultra is extremely older than Motorola One Macro, it's construction is thinner and just a little bit lighter. HTC U Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a way better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Motorola One Macro counts with a bit better processor than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One Macro also has a greater number of cores. The HTC U Ultra has a superior storage for applications and games than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The HTC U Ultra features a slightly better camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega pixels, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations and a way larger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Motorola One Macro has superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.