Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-12 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is much better than Motorola One Macro, getting an 82.5 score against 73.8. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has an older 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie. LG V30S ThinQ's design is thinner and lighter than the Motorola One Macro, although it was released just a little over a year before.
LG V30S ThinQ features a lot better display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a much higher pixels number per inch of display. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Motorola One Macro, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low light situations, a back facing camera with more megapixels, a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola One Macro, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Macro has improved battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.