Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Motorola One Macro, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 73.8. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little heavier than Motorola One Macro, it's just a little thinner and also extremely newer. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola One Macro has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot better screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a better pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a little bit larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola One Macro, because it has a lot better (4K) video resolution, a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola One Macro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little longer battery performance than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.