Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-12 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force is slightly better than the Motorola One Macro, getting a general score of 75.8 against 73.8. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto Z Force has an older 7.0 Nougat version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie. Moto Z Force is an much older phone than Motorola One Macro, but Motorola made it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway.
Motorola Moto Z Force has a more vivid screen than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Motorola One Macro has a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Macro also has 4 more processing cores.
Moto Z Force features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Macro, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments and a back-facing camera with a much higher 21 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola One Macro counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.