Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is slightly better than the Motorola One Macro, with a general score of 79.9 against 73.8. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy A25 5G has the previous 14 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy A25 5G is a noticeably newer and just a bit thinner phone than Motorola One Macro, but it is just a bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a better display density, a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite larger display. Galaxy A25 5G has a much greater memory for games and applications than Motorola One Macro, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Motorola One Macro counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior camera than Motorola One Macro, because it has a back camera with lot more megapixels, a bigger diafragm aperture, a bigger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a lot better video definition.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with better battery duration than Motorola One Macro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.