Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Motorola One Macro, having a 91.3 score against 73.8. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's body is newer and just a bit thinner than the Motorola One Macro's, but it's also just a little heavier. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little better processing power than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a better screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a higher pixels density.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola One Macro, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos, a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Macro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a bit superior battery duration than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.