Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is a lot better than Motorola One Macro's score of 73.8. Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction is newer and a bit thinner than Motorola One Macro's, although it's also just a bit heavier. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better pixels number in each inch of display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Macro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW takes way better videos and photos than Motorola One Macro, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a bigger camera aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments, a way bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little better battery performance than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.