Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is much better than Motorola One Macro, having a overall score of 81.2 against 73.8. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is much older than the Motorola One Macro, it's body is a bit lighter and a little bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a greater count of pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola One Macro has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola One Macro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola One Macro, because although it has lesser RAM memory and lesser CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics processor. The Motorola One Macro has better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
The Galaxy Note 3 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a lot better video resolution and a larger camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.