Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 has a score of 79.5, which is slightly better than Motorola One Macro's 73.8 overall score. Although Galaxy Note7 is notably older than the Motorola One Macro, it's design is a little lighter and somewhat thinner. Motorola One Macro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Macro also has 4 more cores (although slower).
Galaxy Note7 has a more vivid display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher count of pixels per display inch and a way better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Galaxy Note7 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a back camera with lesser mega-pixels, it also counts with a lot higher video quality, a bigger aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures.
Motorola One Macro has slightly more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Macro also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola One Macro has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.