Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Motorola One Macro, having a 98 score against 73.8. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a heavier device than the Motorola One Macro, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. Both devices we are comparing use Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better looking screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a way higher pixels density, a lot better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a little larger display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior memory for applications and games than Motorola One Macro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a little better performance than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with improved battery life than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better photos and videos than Motorola One Macro, because it has a much better resolution back camera, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light captures, a way better video resolution and a lot larger camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.