Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-12 | -- |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Motorola One Macro, having a general score of 90.7 against 73.8. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is way lighter and noticeably thinner than the Motorola One Macro.
The Motorola One Macro counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Motorola One Macro, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a lot higher pixel density and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a greater storage to store more games and applications than Motorola One Macro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features greater battery performance than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Motorola One Macro, because it has a much bigger sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.