Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 271 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than Motorola One Macro, getting an 80.1 score against 73.8. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the older 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than the Motorola One Macro, it must be noted that it is also a much heavier and noticeably thicker phone.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better screen than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a much better quantity of pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Macro. Both have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Macro counts with a better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos and a tinier back camera sensor taking worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola One Macro also counts with a camera with a higher 13 MP resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as the Motorola One Macro one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.