Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is way better than Motorola One Macro, with an 88.5 score against 73.8. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Motorola One Macro were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a more vivid screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a way higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and much more pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola One Macro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip features a much better camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures and videos, a larger camera aperture for better low-light images and a way better video definition.
The Motorola One Macro features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.