Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is much better than the Motorola One Macro's global score of 73.8. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer phone, and it is also much thinner and a little lighter than Motorola One Macro.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a brighter screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a way better display density, a lot higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little bit better performance than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola One Macro takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a more mega-pixels back camera. Motorola One Macro features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Motorola One Macro has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 21% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.