Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Motorola One Macro, getting a 92.3 score against 73.8. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola One Macro.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a sharper screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a much higher display pixels density, a little bit larger screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a lower 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments and a larger sensor.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola One Macro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola One Macro counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.