Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than Motorola One Macro, getting a 94.6 score against 73.8. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is newer and way thinner, but way heavier than the Motorola One Macro.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better display than Motorola One Macro, because it has a larger screen, a better pixels amount per display inch and a lot better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola One Macro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos, a lot higher (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.