Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Motorola One Power's 75.7 score. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Motorola One Power has Android 10, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and improved performance. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than Motorola One Power, but it's just a little bit heavier.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Power, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a just a little higher screen density. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Power, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior processing power than Motorola One Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola One Power counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better camera than Motorola One Power, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot better resolution camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.