Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Blue and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is a bit better than Motorola One Vision's 80.7 general score. LG V60 ThinQ is a newer cellphone than the Motorola One Vision, but it's heavier and a bit thicker. The LG V60 ThinQ has just a little better processing power than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Motorola One Vision has a bit better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2520px resolution. Motorola One Vision has a superior camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot lower (4K) video definition, a smaller sensor which provides a worse image and video quality and a back facing camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.