Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 overall score. Motorola One Vision's body is a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, although it's a little bit thicker and was released many years before. The Motorola One Vision has a very superior processing power than Galaxy A15 5G. Both have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A15 5G has a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. Galaxy A15 5G has a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A15 5G also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Vision has a better camera than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a less MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and video and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a much better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.