Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a bit better than the Motorola One Vision, having a overall score of 83.8 against 80.7. The Galaxy A50 construction is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola One Vision, even when both were released with only 2 months difference. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola One Vision. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM.
Motorola One Vision counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a quite higher pixels amount in each screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A50's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as Motorola One Vision's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 features just a little better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Motorola One Vision captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola One Vision also has a way bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.