Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Prism cube black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than Motorola One Vision, with a 90.8 score against 80.7. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a just a little bit heavier phone than Motorola One Vision, but both of them have the same thickness. Motorola One Vision counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better screen density and a little bit higher 1080 x 2520px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy A51 5G and Motorola One Vision have similar cameras, and although the Galaxy A51 5G has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos or video in low-light environments, they both have the same video frame rates, a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same (4K) video definition and a same resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features improved battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 29 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.