Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is much better than the Motorola One Vision's general score of 80.7. Galaxy A52s's construction is way newer and just a little bit thinner than Motorola One Vision's, but it's also a little heavier. Motorola One Vision features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a bit higher display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has just a bit better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution and a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy A52s counts with slightly more memory for games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52s also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52s counts with better battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.