Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-15 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is way better than Motorola One Vision's 80.7 overall score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Fold and Motorola One Vision were released with only 5 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is extremely thinner but incredibly heavier than Motorola One Vision.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little better performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola One Vision has a little sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2520 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density.
The Galaxy Fold has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola One Vision, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Fold features superior battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
The Motorola One Vision captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a much larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.