Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 435 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is a little bit better than the Motorola One Vision, getting a general score of 87.7 against 80.7. The Galaxy M51 design is newer than the Motorola One Vision's, but it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. Galaxy M51 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy M51 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One Vision has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels. Samsung Galaxy M51 has a bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy M51's memory capacity to install applications and games is very similar to Motorola One Vision's one, both of them have the same internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 100 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.