Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Motorola One Vision's 80.7 score. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer and just a bit thinner phone than Motorola One Vision, but it's heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little sharper display than Motorola One Vision, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little bit greater display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes better videos and photos than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much bigger sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos, a back-facing camera with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has longer battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 29 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.