Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2019-05-15 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Motorola One Vision, having an 89.7 score against 80.7. Although the Galaxy S10 Lite and Motorola One Vision were released only 9 months apart, the Galaxy S10 Lite construction is a little bit thinner but also just a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit faster processor than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola One Vision features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel amount per screen inch and a little bit higher 1080 x 2520 resolution. Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit more storage for applications and games than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a little bit better camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same video quality, a same size camera sensor and a 48 mega pixels back-facing camera, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with better video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has better battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.