Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-15 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blue and Brown | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 FE is better than Motorola One Vision, getting an 89.1 score against 80.7. The Galaxy S21 FE design is noticeably newer, a little bit lighter and a bit thinner than Motorola One Vision. Galaxy S21 FE and Motorola One Vision feature extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy S21 FE has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
Motorola One Vision features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Vision has a much better camera than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE features improved battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 29% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.