Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S is a bit better than the Motorola One, with a 75.8 score against 74.3. These devices use the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system). Nubia Red Magic 3S is a newer phone than Motorola One, although it's a lot heavier and thicker. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a sharper screen than Motorola One, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger display and a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a little better processing power than Motorola One, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a way better camera than Motorola One, because it has a much higher video resolution, a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and videos and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola One, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola One, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.