Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Motorola One, having a overall score of 98.9 against 74.3. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is newer than the Motorola One's, but it is a bit thicker and extremely heavier. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Motorola One, because it has a way higher pixels amount per screen inch, a larger screen and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior memory for games and applications than Motorola One, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures way better videos and photos than Motorola One, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video, a lot better video quality and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better battery life than Motorola One, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.