Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is just a bit better than the Motorola One, having an 80.4 score against 74.3. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition construction has the same thickness than Motorola One, but it is a little heavier. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit better processing unit than Motorola One. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a better screen than Motorola One, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a much higher screen density. The Motorola One and the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition have quite similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, both of them have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB and the same internal memory.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition's camera is very similar to Motorola One's camera, because although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a camera with lesser mega-pixels and a lower video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola One, because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One. If you want to save some money, you can get the Motorola One, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.