Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-09 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the Motorola One, with an 89 score against 74.3. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 body has the same thickness than Motorola One, but it's a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit superior CPU than Motorola One, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a brighter screen than Motorola One, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher pixel count per screen inch and a much higher 1080 x 2280 resolution. The Galaxy Note10 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Note10 has a bit better battery performance than Motorola One, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy Note10 takes clearer pictures and videos than Motorola One, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.