Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-11-09 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Motorola One, having a general score of 98 against 74.3. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version and Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is newer than Motorola One's, although it's somewhat thicker and way heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better screen than Motorola One, because it has a lot better screen density, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola One, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better camera than Motorola One, because it has a much more megapixels back camera, a bigger aperture and a much higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola One, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G costs a lot more than Motorola One, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.