Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-09 | -- |
| 5.91 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.71 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 311.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 285 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Motorola One, with a 90.7 score against 74.3. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the older 14 version while Motorola One has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is notably thinner and notably lighter than Motorola One.
The Motorola One counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola One, because it has a bigger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a lot more pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola One, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola One, because it has a larger aperture for better photos and video in low light environments, a lot better video resolution and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much longer battery duration than Motorola One, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.